Shareholding Structure: Peeling Back the Layers

Shareholding Structure: Peeling Back the Layers

Shareholding structure, aka the breakdown of ownership and control within a company, details the number of shares held by different individuals or entities. This information is crucial during the KYB process as it helps identify the key decision-makers, beneficial owners, and potential conflicts of interest.

Featured in:
Featured Blog Posts
Compliance Corner: Crypto, FCA, and Other News
May 21, 2024
Obtention de l'agrément PSAN auprès de l'AMF : quelles options ?
March 21, 2024
Roundtable Partners With Dotfile to Accelerate Investor Onboarding
February 13, 2024

Understanding a company's shareholding structure is vital for several reasons. Firstly, it enables organizations to comply with AML and CTF regulations, which require them to identify and verify the UBOs. Secondly, it helps assess the risk associated with a business relationship by revealing potential PEPs or individuals with adverse media coverage. Lastly, it provides insights into the company's governance and decision-making processes, which can impact its overall risk profile.

The KYB process involves gathering and analyzing various pieces of information about a company and its shareholding structure. This process typically involves obtaining official documents, such as articles of incorporation, shareholder registers, and annual reports, as well as conducting independent research and verification.

Understanding Shareholding Structures

During the KYB process, it's crucial to identify how the ownership and control of a business entity are distributed among its shareholders. The most common types of shareholding structures include: Sole Proprietorship, Partnership, Limited Liability Company (LLC), Corporation, and Public and Private Companies. Read more about the basics of the ownership structure.

Identifying Beneficial Owners and Shareholders

Beneficial owners refer to the individuals who ultimately own or control a legal entity, such as a company or trust. They may not necessarily be the legal owners or shareholders on record, but rather the individuals who exercise significant influence or control over the entity.

There are several methods for identifying beneficial owners and shareholders:

  1. Company Registers: Most jurisdictions require companies to maintain a register of shareholders, which lists the individuals or entities that own shares in the company. This register can provide valuable information about the shareholding structure and the individuals involved.
  2. Legal Documents: Various legal documents, such as articles of incorporation, bylaws, and shareholder agreements, may contain information about the company's ownership structure and the rights and responsibilities of shareholders.
  3. Public Records: In some cases, information about a company's ownership structure may be available through public records, such as corporate filings, regulatory disclosures, or court documents.
  4. Due Diligence Questionnaires: As part of the KYB process, companies may require beneficial owners and shareholders to complete due diligence questionnaires, which gather information about their identities, sources of wealth, and any potential conflicts of interest or regulatory concerns.
  5. Third-Party Databases: There are various commercial databases and intelligence platforms that aggregate and analyze information about companies, their ownership structures, and their beneficial owners. These resources can be valuable tools in the KYB process.

Understanding Complex Ownership Structures

Identifying the shareholding structure can be challenging, especially when dealing with complex ownership structures. These arrangements often involve various entities, such as holding companies, trusts, and other legal structures, making it difficult to determine the ultimate beneficial owners.

One common scenario is direct and indirect ownership. Direct ownership refers to individuals or entities that hold shares directly in a company. Indirect ownership, on the other hand, occurs when an individual or entity owns shares through another legal entity, such as a holding company or a trust. In these cases, it's essential to peel back the layers of ownership to identify the UBOs.

Another aspect to consider is control through voting rights or other means. Even if an individual or entity does not hold a majority stake in a company, they may still exercise control through voting agreements, board representation, or other contractual arrangements. These mechanisms can grant significant influence over a company's operations and decision-making processes.

Complex ownership structures can also involve networks of holding companies, trusts, and other legal entities spread across multiple jurisdictions. These arrangements are often designed to obfuscate the true ownership and control of a company, making it challenging for regulatory authorities and investigators to unravel the web of ownership.

Identifying Shareholding Structure from Official Sources

One of the primary sources for obtaining business information is official company registries and public records maintained by government agencies or regulatory bodies.

These official registries typically contain details about a company's ownership structure, including the names of shareholders, their respective shareholdings, and any changes or updates to this information over time.

It's important to note that the specific information available and the level of detail provided may vary across different jurisdictions and registries. Some registries may offer more granular information than others, and the accessibility of data may also differ. In certain cases, you may need to consult multiple official sources to obtain a complete picture of a company's shareholding structure.

It's also advisable to cross-reference this information with other reliable sources, such as third-party data providers or publicly available financial reports and disclosures. It helps to validate the accuracy and completeness of the shareholding information, identify any potential discrepancies or inconsistencies that may require further investigation.

Thorough verification is crucial because shareholding structures can be complex, particularly for larger companies or those with intricate ownership structures involving holding companies, trusts, or offshore entities. By triangulating data from various sources, you can mitigate the risk of relying on incomplete or outdated information, ensuring a more robust and comprehensive understanding of a company's shareholding structure.

Importance of Regular Monitoring and Re-Verification

Shareholding structures are not static; they can evolve over time due to various factors such as changes in ownership, control, or business activities. Regular monitoring and re-verification of the shareholding structure are crucial to ensure compliance and mitigate potential risks.

One of the primary triggers for re-verification is a change in ownership or control. This could occur when new shareholders acquire a significant stake in the company or when existing shareholders increase or decrease their holdings. Such changes can alter the power dynamics and decision-making processes within the organization, potentially introducing new risks or exposing the company to different regulatory requirements.

Real-time monitoring comes in handy ensuring that the shareholding information remains current and accurate. This is particularly important in dynamic business environments where ownership structures may change frequently due to mergers, acquisitions, or other corporate events.

Another trigger for re-verification is a change in the company's business activities. If the company expands into new industries, markets, or jurisdictions, it may be subject to different regulatory frameworks or face new risks that require a reassessment of its shareholding structure and associated risks.

Regular monitoring also helps identify gradual shifts in the shareholding structure that may not be immediately apparent. For example, if a shareholder gradually increases their stake over time through multiple smaller transactions, it could eventually result in a change of control or influence within the company.

Dealing with Complex Shareholding Structures

When faced with complex shareholding structures, it is essential to adopt a risk-based approach and conduct enhanced due diligence. This may involve scrutinizing multiple layers of ownership and cross-referencing information from various sources.

One common strategy is to follow the trail of ownership through successive tiers of holding companies, subsidiaries, and affiliated entities. This process often requires examining corporate records, shareholder registers, and other relevant documentation to unravel the intricate web of relationships and identify the UBOs.

Particular attention should be paid to jurisdictions known for lax corporate transparency regulations or those considered tax havens. These locations may be exploited to obscure ownership structures. In such cases, it may be difficult to gain a comprehensive understanding of the ownership landscape.

It is also crucial to remain vigilant for red flags that may indicate the presence of shell companies or other vehicles used for illicit purposes, such as money laundering or tax evasion. These warning signs may include companies with no discernible business operations, complex ownership trails leading to high-risk jurisdictions, or inconsistencies in the reported information. Adopting a risk-based approach and conducting enhanced due diligence measures are critical.

A comprehensive compliance solution should also help in getting a holistic view of the complex shareholding structures. To better understand the ownership structure, Dotfile introduced the Case Graph. It allows businesses to see a visual representation of the company structure including information about the main company, individuals, and affiliated companies.

The case graph is a comprehensive graphical representation of the ownership structure of the company that is the target of the KYB process.

The Importance of Accurate Shareholding Structure Identification

Failure to accurately identify the shareholding structure and UBOs can result in severe consequences, including hefty fines, reputational damage, and potential criminal charges. Regulators around the world have increased their scrutiny and enforcement of KYB and customer due diligence requirements, making it imperative for businesses to prioritize this aspect of their compliance programs.

By understanding the shareholding structure, businesses can better assess the risk associated with a potential client or business partner. This information helps identify any PEPs, individuals or entities subject to sanctions, or other high-risk individuals or entities that may be involved. Accurate shareholding information also aids in detecting potential conflicts of interest, related party transactions, and other red flags that could indicate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit activities.

Dotfile’s end-to-end KYB platform streamlines all processes related to business verification, shareholding structure identification, and verification of UBOs and key stakeholders. Dotfile helps businesses streamline their compliance operations, reduce risk, and build trust. Book a demo to see how we can help you

Start building fintech product now.
It all starts here.

Book a demo
--> -->